<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hairspray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberelk.net/sue/2007/10/07/hairspray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberelk.net/sue/2007/10/07/hairspray/</link>
	<description>A place to share thoughts and photographs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 22:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Waugh</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/sue/2007/10/07/hairspray/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/sue/2007/10/07/hairspray/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been curious about the TV adverts for hair products where they claim things like &quot;80% more bounce&quot; or &quot;50% more shine&quot;.  Are they standing there with some sort of bounce-ometer when they do the tests?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been curious about the TV adverts for hair products where they claim things like &#8220;80% more bounce&#8221; or &#8220;50% more shine&#8221;.  Are they standing there with some sort of bounce-ometer when they do the tests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

