<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digitizing 35mm slides without a slide scanner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-7/#comment-30325</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-30325</guid>
		<description>Sharon: thanks, yes I knew about the flood, and we&#039;ve been to Boscastle since then.  I&#039;ve updated the article to show a picture of what&#039;s there now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon: thanks, yes I knew about the flood, and we&#8217;ve been to Boscastle since then.  I&#8217;ve updated the article to show a picture of what&#8217;s there now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-7/#comment-30318</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-30318</guid>
		<description>I caught your website as my mum is looking for a similar solution for boxes of 35 mm slides that my grandad had.

I just had to reply to you when I saw the Pixie House at Boscastle in Cornwall.
The Pixie House was washed away when the flood hit Boscastle a few years ago and this would be a very important picture to the local history I am sure.

I haven&#039;t been back to Boscastle since the flood so I&#039;m not sure what is in its place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught your website as my mum is looking for a similar solution for boxes of 35 mm slides that my grandad had.</p>
<p>I just had to reply to you when I saw the Pixie House at Boscastle in Cornwall.<br />
The Pixie House was washed away when the flood hit Boscastle a few years ago and this would be a very important picture to the local history I am sure.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been back to Boscastle since the flood so I&#8217;m not sure what is in its place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-7/#comment-10049</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-10049</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve since got one of these: http://www.firebox.com/product/2614/Photo-and-Negative-Scanners (the SD version) which works very well without needing any computer at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve since got one of these: <a href="http://www.firebox.com/product/2614/Photo-and-Negative-Scanners" rel="nofollow">http://www.firebox.com/product/2614/Photo-and-Negative-Scanners</a> (the SD version) which works very well without needing any computer at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Corderoy</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-10048</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Corderoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-10048</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim, I was looking at getting a film scanner a few years ago but poor Linux support put me off.  I did find VueScan, http://www.hamrick.com/ a commercial but inexpensive scanning program that started out specialising in film scanners and is available for Linux.  The author signs NDAs, etc., with manufacturers to get the specs required, IIRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim, I was looking at getting a film scanner a few years ago but poor Linux support put me off.  I did find VueScan, <a href="http://www.hamrick.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hamrick.com/</a> a commercial but inexpensive scanning program that started out specialising in film scanners and is available for Linux.  The author signs NDAs, etc., with manufacturers to get the specs required, IIRC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera &#124; Photography News</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-8791</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera &#124; Photography News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-8791</guid>
		<description>[...] following sites are great references for more of the same information: Print Head, Simple Slide Copy Jig, Macro Lens &amp; Tripod.   This entry was posted in Digital Cameras, Film [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following sites are great references for more of the same information: Print Head, Simple Slide Copy Jig, Macro Lens &amp; Tripod.   This entry was posted in Digital Cameras, Film [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Bonde</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-6451</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Bonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-6451</guid>
		<description>I just made my own 35mm automatic slide scanner based on a Nikon camera and Kodak projector which are tied together with a control box I have designed for the purpose. It runs perfectly and scans my slides fast and easy - so the method is highly recommendable. You can see a description with pictures and an equipment list here http://www.avidia.dk/hardware.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just made my own 35mm automatic slide scanner based on a Nikon camera and Kodak projector which are tied together with a control box I have designed for the purpose. It runs perfectly and scans my slides fast and easy &#8211; so the method is highly recommendable. You can see a description with pictures and an equipment list here <a href="http://www.avidia.dk/hardware.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.avidia.dk/hardware.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-6183</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-6183</guid>
		<description>To cut down on the time it takes to scan your negatives make sure the scanner you buy is capable of batch processing. This could cut down your processing time by a factor of 5 or 6. The prices for scanners continue to come down and the tech just keeps getting better.

Great info here though if you fon&#039;t want to go the buy route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To cut down on the time it takes to scan your negatives make sure the scanner you buy is capable of batch processing. This could cut down your processing time by a factor of 5 or 6. The prices for scanners continue to come down and the tech just keeps getting better.</p>
<p>Great info here though if you fon&#8217;t want to go the buy route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-5815</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-5815</guid>
		<description>It has been a while since this post and technology has hopefully evolved enough to produce slide scanners of much better quality. There are, however, some requirements that need to be taken care of in favor of having a good quality scan of a slide or film.

Some tips may be found here:
http://slidescannertips.com/flatbed-slide-scanner/

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a while since this post and technology has hopefully evolved enough to produce slide scanners of much better quality. There are, however, some requirements that need to be taken care of in favor of having a good quality scan of a slide or film.</p>
<p>Some tips may be found here:<br />
<a href="http://slidescannertips.com/flatbed-slide-scanner/" rel="nofollow">http://slidescannertips.com/flatbed-slide-scanner/</a></p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Fajerman</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Fajerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>Doesnt this take a long time for each slide? If you have a few thousand to deal with, you wnat something really snappy. Any suggestions? Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesnt this take a long time for each slide? If you have a few thousand to deal with, you wnat something really snappy. Any suggestions? Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Nogueira</title>
		<link>http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/comment-page-6/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Nogueira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberelk.net/tim/2007/03/04/digitizing-35mm-slides-without-a-slide-scanner/#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t imagine how I&#039;m hapy to see I gona save my 4.000 old slides from 1967 til now, using this simple sistem... Tanks and sorry my english... I&#039;m from Brazil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t imagine how I&#8217;m hapy to see I gona save my 4.000 old slides from 1967 til now, using this simple sistem&#8230; Tanks and sorry my english&#8230; I&#8217;m from Brazil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

