Philip Blundell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 14 May 1999 21:33:26 +0100
>parport_frob_control(...INTEN) can do the same job. But I wonder if
>that's the right way to go, or whether to say that the 'control' register
>consists of bits that directly control lines.
The latter, very definitely. Overloading the `control' register too much just
adds pain for people implementing non-PC ports. Keep it for bits that
actually drive signals directly.
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: email@example.com --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri 14 May 1999 - 16:49:51 EDT