What kernel version did the problems start to occur? There have been
several rounds of changes to the ll_rw_blk code (not all of which I was
directly responsible for), and it would help a lot to narrow it down to a
specific kernel version. If the primary author of the change in question
was someone else, I can help to bring that person into the loop too.
----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Inge Bolsų <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Eric Youngdale <email@example.com>
Cc: Linux-parport mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: New queueing code
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Eric Youngdale wrote:
> > Which source files are involved with ParIDE, and what are the
> >of the breakage?
> Source files:
> drivers/block/paride/*, in particular pd.c, pf.c, pt.c, pcd.c and pg.c.
> >Did a little more experimenting with EPAT + PD in kernel 2.3.49pre1
> >A log message I got, without taking the computer down with it this time:
> >Mar 7 20:03:16 frankenstein kernel: pda: OUCH: b_reqnext != NULL
> >Mar 7 20:03:17 frankenstein last message repeated 46 times
> >A PD bug? Or is that assertion failure the lower-level protocol's fault?
> (I was later assured this was a symptom of incompatible request queue
> >The next time I tried, it panicked, dumped a screenful of traceback (more
> >than 50 lines) that seemed, judging by the addresses, to be in an
> >infinite loop. Then the interrupt handler was killed so that I have no
> >log of the incident. (Sorry, no serial console to capture such things
> >Sysrq-K in this state caused an immediate reboot.
> Erik I. Bolsų <knan at mo.himolde.no> | <eriki at himolde.no>
> .. student of IT administration at Molde College, Norway.
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: email@example.com --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 08 2000 - 10:53:51 EST