Re: [PARPORT] unkwon classe reported by parport_probe

• Previous message: Philip Blundell: "[PARPORT] Re: unkwon classe reported by parport_probe"
• In reply to: stef: "[PARPORT] unkwon classe reported by parport_probe"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, stef wrote:

> After the following patch:

I'm reluctant to apply this patch because:

- IMAGE is just wrong. I wish vendors would read standards some time.
- all it buys you is a pretty message.

But in fact, the parport_probe stuff hasn't been nearly as useful as
I'd hoped, so it doesn't really matter I guess.

Tim.
*/

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

• Next message: Bernie Gardner: "[PARPORT] Parallel port HP Colorado 20GB use."
• Previous message: Philip Blundell: "[PARPORT] Re: unkwon classe reported by parport_probe"
• In reply to: stef: "[PARPORT] unkwon classe reported by parport_probe"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 16:45:52 EDT