On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:12:53PM -0500, email@example.com wrote:
> What about dmafifo. It is more specific and avoids the shadowing. It
> also then would distinguish from the piofifo I'm getting ready.
> (Christmas should drop the workload enough to let me get it ready.)
I'd like in the end to be able to turn off _all_ 'special' hardware
acceleration tricks without needing a recompile.
I can turn DMA off with 'dma=none', and at the moment I can turn off
PIO with 'irq=none' (but I think you're working on changing that..).
How about if I call the parameter pio, so that 'pio=0 dma=none' will
do what I want?
Can anyone think of a better name?
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 20 2000 - 12:08:09 EST