Re: [PARPORT] parport printing problem....

• Previous message: pixel: "[PARPORT] parport printing problem...."
• In reply to: pixel: "[PARPORT] parport printing problem...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yes, this is VIA chipset-specific. Jeff Garzik maintains that code:
Jeff, this has been broken for ages---is it fixable?

Tim.
*/

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:24:10AM +0800, pixel wrote:

> i think it might be something wrong with the VIA chipset.
> dmesg shows the following....
>
> parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 3
> [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA]
> parport0: cpp_mux: aa55f00f52ad51(80)
> parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(80)
> parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(80)
> parport0: cpp_mux: aa55f00f52ad51(80)
> parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(80)
> parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(80)
> parport_pc: Strange, can't probe Via 686A parallel port: io=0x378,
> irq=-1, dma=-1

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

• Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PARPORT] Re: linux-2.4.2 pd.c patch - driver was untested??? (this patch too, I have no PARIDE HW ;-( )"
• Previous message: pixel: "[PARPORT] parport printing problem...."
• In reply to: pixel: "[PARPORT] parport printing problem...."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 22 2001 - 18:29:59 EDT