Re: [PARPORT] overhead?

Kev (klmitch@mit.edu)
Fri, 04 Jun 1999 12:44:14 EDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Moore Family: "[PARPORT] M.S. Backpack probing fail"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PARPORT] overhead?"
• In reply to: Kev: "[PARPORT] overhead?"

> > device as designed, however, requires a continuous stream of bytes; thus, I
> > would have to send a new byte to the parallel port every 32 us. This
>
> Wrong hammer 8)

I figured it might be, thus my message.

> http://www.rtlinux.org

I'll probably opt to see if I can redesign the device somewhat; thanks...

-- 
Kevin L. Mitchell <klmitch@mit.edu>
-------------------------  -. .---- --.. ..- -..-  --------------------------
http://web.mit.edu/klmitch/www/               (PGP keys availiable from here)
    RSA AE87D37D/1024:  DE EA 1E 99 3F 2B F9 23  A0 D8 05 E0 6F BA B9 D2
    DSS ED0DB34E/1024: D9BF 0E74 FDCB 43F5 C597  878F 9455 EC24 ED0D B34E
    DH  2A2C31D4/2048: 1A77 4BA5 9E32 14AE 87DA  9FEC 7106 FC62 2A2C 31D4
--  To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
--  with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

• Next message: Moore Family: "[PARPORT] M.S. Backpack probing fail"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PARPORT] overhead?"
• In reply to: Kev: "[PARPORT] overhead?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri 04 Jun 1999 - 12:46:08 EDT