Tim Waugh (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sat, 30 Oct 1999 13:23:42 +0100 (BST)
Does anybody remember why we check for the Intel ECPEPP bug? The symptom
is that the EPP timeout bit is _not_ set to 1 when not in EPP mode.
The original check is due to David Campbell, and it is found in his
id_probe program as well as older versions of ppa.c.
I can't think of what bad effects it could have. It would be nice if we
could get rid of the check if there really isn't anything bad that can
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: email@example.com --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat 30 Oct 1999 - 09:25:09 EDT