[PARPORT] Is the pt driver in kernel 2.2 different than in 2.0?

Barnet Wagman (wagman@enteract.com)
Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:47:20 -0600

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: [PARPORT] ECR setting problem solved, sort of."
• Previous message: Tim Waugh: "Re: [PARPORT] (no subject)"
• Next in thread: Ian Soboroff: "Re: [PARPORT] Is the pt driver in kernel 2.2 different than in 2.0?"

Does the pt driver in kernel 2.2 have the same functionality as the one
in 2.0?

I'm currently attempting to use pt with an HP 5gb parallel port
tape drive under 2.0. It seems to work quite will but with limited
funtionality; e.g. tar [cvx] works but tar [ar] does not.

I'm getting ready to switch to the 2.2 kernel and was wondering if there

will be any difference.

Thanks,

Barnet Wagman

wagman@enteract.com

-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

• Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: [PARPORT] ECR setting problem solved, sort of."
• Previous message: Tim Waugh: "Re: [PARPORT] (no subject)"
• Next in thread: Ian Soboroff: "Re: [PARPORT] Is the pt driver in kernel 2.2 different than in 2.0?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 16 Feb 2000 - 06:46:14 EST