Tim Waugh wrote:
> Some of the bits are inverted, which is why the difference. However,
> I can never remember which ones, so there might be some mistakes.
Does that means somewhere in the code, there are inversion happens, I have not
look through the code very carefully? Setting the frob_control on those bits
actually inverted the result.
Could you recall which are the inverted bits?
> Perhaps a better way to have done it in the first place would have
> been to make the lowlevel driver take care of that..
Yes, it is better than never, will you change that some time? Anyway I will
change the necessary bits for my usage first.
-- (~._.~) Öì Èº Ó¢ (Qun Ying) (65) 874-6743 ( O ) Kent Ridge Digital Labs (KRDL) ()~*~() 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613 (_)-(_) email@example.com * firstname.lastname@example.org
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: email@example.com -- -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 26 2000 - 08:29:05 EDT