On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 05:07:31PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> The only bit I'm not keen on is actually using write() as the
> mechanism; I'd prefer to invent "ioctl(PPSPEW)" or something, so
> that the core parport code doesn't have to change.
Which seems better?
ioctl(fd, PPSPEW, buffer, len)
or
ioctl (fd, PPHANDSHAKE, &turn_off);
write (fd, buffer, len);
or
ioctl (fd, PPSETMODE, IEEE1284_MODE_SPEW);
write (fd, buffer, len);
or something else?
Tim.
*/
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 03 2001 - 13:32:06 EDT