Re: [PARPORT] LPGETSTATUS

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Dec 17 2002 - 18:36:06 EST

  • Next message: Nate: "Re: [PARPORT] LPGETSTATUS"

    On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:05:37PM -0800, Nate wrote:

    > I am writing a program that switches (mutually exclusive) between using lp
    > and ppdev depending on the settings the user desires, (lp for real printing
    > and ppdev for data transferring). So I am loading on demand the required
    > module. That part is working, however, if I am trying to print to a printer
    > everything works as I expect as long as there is a printer physically
    > connected. The problem is when there is no printer connected. I am trying
    > to put in some "timeout" code for this situation.
    >
    > I am doing an ioctl call with LPGETSTATUS. I see in the lp.c code that the
    > said case calls "lp_claim_parport_or_block(...)". In my program, it is
    > looks like it is blocking. It looks locked up. Is that because I have not
    > previously claimed the port? Is there a similar call to find the status
    > which won't block?

    If the lp driver is in interrupt-driven mode it holds on to the port
    too long. Known issue.

    You can send a signal to the process holding the port lock, and it
    will return.

    Tim.
    */



    -- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
    -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 17 2002 - 18:38:30 EST