Re: [PARPORT] Second parallel port

From: James Mckenzie (jjmckenzie51@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 21:25:50 EST

  • Next message: David Euresti: "Re: [PARPORT] Second parallel port"

    David:

    No, the second device should be XXX1 not XXX16. I'm guessing that the
    literature you read was incorrect.

    James McKenzie

    On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 18:14, David Euresti wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > I was wondering what the correct device for a parallel port is. I
    > know that the first parallel port is /dev/parport0 but what is the
    > second? Some literature says /dev/parport16 but I just added a PCI
    > parallel port and it showed up as /dev/parport1 Did I do something
    > wrong? Are pci parallel ports strange?
    >
    > I'm using Kernel 2.4.19
    >
    > Thanks,
    > David Euresti
    >
    >
    >
    > -- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
    > -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
    >

    -- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
    -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 21:30:21 EST