Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@e-mind.com)
Mon, 28 Sep 1998 12:11:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, Philip Blundell wrote:
>>Why should' t we warn pardevice developers that LURK does mean nothing?
>>Should I change it in: printk("this is a harmless message:
>>parport%d...."); ;-)?
>
>The warning does no good. Next time the developer recompiles his driver he
>will see that LURK doesn't exist in any case. Since the driver passing in the
>LURK flag does absolutely no harm either we might as well just leave it alone.
OK warning removed (I really trust you because I don' t agree for
nothing).
I don' t see how the pardevice developer can notice that the LURK doesn' t
exists without reading parport.h though.
I just put out a new parport-arca.
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 30 Dec 1998 - 10:18:25 EST