Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 08:38:00PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> > It looks to me like the old code should have handled the `offline' case.
> It Works For Me.
> > I agree that LP_CAREFUL is no longer useful. Once upon a time it actually
> > affected the semantics of printing, not just error reporting. You should
> > probably also make the LPCAREFUL ioctl print a warning message.
> LP_CAREFUL is still needed, I'm afraid. See Andrea's latest megapatch
> for 2.2.
Where can I get this megapatch?
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 16 2000 - 13:41:03 EDT