On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 08:38:00PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> It looks to me like the old code should have handled the `offline' case.
It Works For Me.
> I agree that LP_CAREFUL is no longer useful. Once upon a time it actually
> affected the semantics of printing, not just error reporting. You should
> probably also make the LPCAREFUL ioctl print a warning message.
LP_CAREFUL is still needed, I'm afraid. See Andrea's latest megapatch
for 2.2.
Tim.
*/
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 15 2000 - 16:51:33 EDT