Re: [PARPORT] Slow Zip drive access in Red Hat 8.0

From: Robert Heller (heller@deepsoft.com)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 16:25:35 EST

  • Next message: David Euresti: "[PARPORT] Second parallel port"

      Chris Abrams <cja5@onetel.net.uk>,
      In a message on 06 Feb 2003 15:52:25 +0000, wrote :

    CA> Hi,
    CA>
    CA> I've just completed an installation of Red Hat Linux 8.0 on my laptop
    CA> and everything is working fine except for the Iomega Parallel Port Zip
    CA> 100 drive. I also have a HP Deskjet 720C printer connected to the
    CA> pass-through port on the Zip. The first time I booted up, my printer was
    CA> found and correctly configured. The zip drive was not found but I was
    CA> able to get it working by using "modprobe imm". The zip drive and the
    CA> printer appear to happily coexist together. The problem is with transfer
    CA> speeds to and from the zip drive, which are incredibly slow. Previously

    This is *unfortunately* normal. The parallel port Zip drives are just
    plain slow. You can get better performance with an IDE Zip drive or
    even better with a real SCSI Zip drive (with a supported SCSI card).

    CA> I was using Mandrake Linux 8.1 and it configured the zip drive without
    CA> any intervention from me and the transfer speeds were excellent. I
    CA> believe the problem is related to the transfer speeds across my parallel
    CA> port. After loading the imm module I checked the System log and this was
    CA> the output:
    CA>
    CA> Feb 6 12:30:59 localhost kernel: SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
    CA> Feb 6 12:30:59 localhost kernel: imm: Version 2.05 (for Linux 2.4.0)
    CA> Feb 6 12:30:59 localhost kernel: imm: Found device at ID 6, Attempting
    CA> to use EPP 32 bit
    CA> Feb 6 12:30:59 localhost kernel: imm: Found device at ID 6, Attempting
    CA> to use PS/2
    CA> Feb 6 12:30:59 localhost kernel: imm: Communication established at
    CA> 0x378 with ID 6 using PS/2
    CA> Feb 6 12:30:59 localhost kernel: scsi0 : Iomega VPI2 (imm) interface
    CA> Feb 6 12:31:01 localhost kernel: Vendor: IOMEGA Model: ZIP
    CA> 100 Rev: J.67
    CA> Feb 6 12:31:01 localhost kernel: Type:
    CA> Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
    CA>
    CA> I don't think I have an ECP/EPP parallel port but why does the system
    CA> choose PS/2 to communicate with the zip drive? Could this be why
    CA> transfer speeds are so slow? Is there any way I can improve transfer
    CA> speeds to and from my Zip drive?
    CA>
    CA> My hardware is : Compaq Presario 1266 laptop with external monitor, USB
    CA> keyboard, PS/2 wheelmouse; the CPU is an AMD K6-II and I have 160 MB
    CA> RAM.
    CA>
    CA> I'd be very grateful if anyone has any suggestions.

    An Adaptec SlimSCSI PCMCIA card and a true SCSI Zip drive will give you
    better performance.

    CA>
    CA> Many thanks,
    CA>
    CA> Chris Abrams.
    CA>
    CA>
    CA>
    CA> -- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
    CA> -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
    CA>
    CA>

                                         \/
    Robert Heller ||InterNet: heller@cs.umass.edu
    http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller || heller@deepsoft.com
    http://www.deepsoft.com /\FidoNet: 1:321/153

                                                        

    -- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
    -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 16:12:51 EST