Re: [PARPORT] Re: 2.1.96 patches [new round robin regime]

Grant R. Guenther (
Sun, 19 Apr 1998 10:03:12 -0400 (EDT)

> We could leave the wakeup style the same, forcing the pardevice to claim
> parport inside the wakeup callback, but if we will do that it' s only to
> be backwards compatible with the old drivers code. Since the patch is
> really _trivial_ I didn' t take the compatible way since the new way is
> the obvious one. Grant do you agree with me here? Did you see the
> paride.c patch inside my latest patch?

I saw the patch, and agree that it is trivial, but I don't think this
is an appropriate time to be making changes to any interfaces, no matter
how desirable or trivial. In this particular case, the "compatible way"
costs very little.

Grant R. Guenther

-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 30 Dec 1998 - 10:17:38 EST