Re: [PARPORT] May we get one bit in stuct parport_device_info?

Philip Blundell (Philip.Blundell@pobox.com)
Sat, 25 Apr 1998 12:09:23 +0100

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: David Campbell: "[PARPORT] ZIP+ Driver (imm-0.15) release (and it works! :=)"
• Previous message: schreite@helena.physik.uni-stuttgart.de: "[PARPORT] May we get one bit in stuct parport_device_info?"
• Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PARPORT] May we get one bit in stuct parport_device_info?"

>May I add an integer "flags" to parport_device_info take one flag
>to indicate, whether there was probed a MLC device? Perhaps parse_data(...)
>should mark in that flag integer any common language and protocol
>found in COMMAND SET (since it already parses for PJL and PCL)?

Yes, that sounds like a good idea.

>Where do I send the patches?

Send them to this list or to Tim Waugh (see the MAINTAINERS file).

>Is the parport code found in the kernel 2.1.97 code the most recent one

Basically yes.

p.

-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

• Next message: David Campbell: "[PARPORT] ZIP+ Driver (imm-0.15) release (and it works! :=)"
• Previous message: schreite@helena.physik.uni-stuttgart.de: "[PARPORT] May we get one bit in stuct parport_device_info?"
• Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [PARPORT] May we get one bit in stuct parport_device_info?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 30 Dec 1998 - 10:17:40 EST