[PARPORT] Mode 1 or Mode 2?

Frank Schloeder (frs@zeus.ph1.Uni-Koeln.DE)
Wed, 22 Jul 1998 09:09:53 +0200 (METDST)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Claus-Justus Heine: "[PARPORT] [ANNOUNCE] ftape-4.x-beta-8"
• Previous message: Simon Paradis: "Re: [PARPORT] parallel port mode issues"
• Next in thread: grant@torque.net: "Re: [PARPORT] Mode 1 or Mode 2?"

Hallo,

one question: Which mode should I prefer?

  kernel: pda: epat 1.01, Shuttle EPAT chip c3 at 0x378, mode 2 (8-bit),
          delay 1
  kernel: pda: SyQuest EZ230A, master, 450560 blocks [220M], (880/16/32),
          removable media

or

  kernel: pda: epat 1.01, Shuttle EPAT chip c3 at 0x378, mode 1 (5/3),
          delay 1
  kernel: pda: SyQuest EZ230A, master, 450560 blocks [220M], (880/16/32),
          removable media

Is mode 2 always better than 1 and mode 3 better than 2 and,....

Gru"s,
   Frank

-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

• Next message: Claus-Justus Heine: "[PARPORT] [ANNOUNCE] ftape-4.x-beta-8"
• Previous message: Simon Paradis: "Re: [PARPORT] parallel port mode issues"
• Next in thread: grant@torque.net: "Re: [PARPORT] Mode 1 or Mode 2?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 30 Dec 1998 - 10:18:02 EST